banner



Home  ›  What Term Describes The Behavior Of An Animal Which Warned Others That A Predator Is Approaching?

What Term Describes The Behavior Of An Animal Which Warned Others That A Predator Is Approaching?

Written By Friday, April 29, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Honest signalling of an animal'south powerful defences

Aposematism is the advertising by an fauna to potential predators that it is neither worth attacking nor eating it.[1] This unprofitability may consist of any defences which make the prey difficult to kill and consume, such equally toxicity, venom, foul sense of taste or smell, sharp spines, or aggressive nature. These advertising signals may take the form of conspicuous coloration, sounds, odours,[2] or other perceivable characteristics. Aposematic signals are beneficial for both predator and casualty, since both avert potential harm.

The term was coined in 1877 by Edward Bagnall Poulton[3] [four] for Alfred Russel Wallace's concept of warning coloration.[5] Aposematism is exploited in Müllerian mimicry, where species with strong defences evolve to resemble one another. By mimicking similarly coloured species, the alarm signal to predators is shared, causing them to learn more than apace at less of a price.

A genuine aposematic betoken that a species really possesses chemical or concrete defences is not the only style to deter predators. In Batesian mimicry, a mimicking species resembles an aposematic model closely plenty to share the protection, while many species have backbiting deimatic displays which may startle a predator long enough to enable an otherwise undefended casualty to escape. There is good evidence for aposematism in terrestrial animals; its being in marine animals is possible merely disputed.

Etymology [edit]

The term aposematism was coined by the English zoologist Edward Bagnall Poulton in his 1890 volume The Colours of Animals. He based the term on the Aboriginal Greek words ἀπό apo "away" and σῆμα sēma "sign", referring to signs that warn other animals away.[3] [iv]

Defense mechanism [edit]

The function of aposematism is to forbid assail, by warning potential predators that the prey beast has defences such as being unpalatable or poisonous. The easily detected warning is a chief defense force machinery, and the not-visible defences are secondary.[vi] Aposematic signals are primarily visual, using bright colours and high-dissimilarity patterns such as stripes. Warning signals are honest indications of baneful prey, because conspicuousness evolves in tandem with noxiousness.[7] Thus, the brighter and more conspicuous the organism, the more than toxic information technology usually is.[7] [8] This is in dissimilarity to deimatic displays, which effort to startle a predator with a threatening appearance simply which are bluffing, unsupported by any strong defences.[9]

The most common and effective colours are red, yellowish, blackness and white.[10] These colours provide strong contrast with green foliage, resist changes in shadow and lighting, are highly chromatic, and provide distance dependent camouflage.[10] Some forms of warning coloration provide this altitude dependent cover-up by having an effective design and colour combination that practise not allow for easy detection by a predator from a distance, but are warning-like from a close proximity, assuasive for an advantageous balance between camouflage and aposematism.[11] Warning coloration evolves in response to background, light weather condition, and predator vision.[12] Visible signals may be accompanied past odours, sounds or behaviour to provide a multi-modal signal which is more effectively detected by predators.[13]

Hycleus lugens, an aposematically coloured beetle

Unpalatability, broadly understood, can be created in a diverseness of ways. Some insects such every bit the ladybird or tiger moth incorporate bitter-tasting chemicals,[14] while the skunk produces a noxious odour, and the poison glands of the toxicant dart frog, the sting of a velvet ant or neurotoxin in a blackness widow spider brand them dangerous or painful to assail. Tiger moths advertise their unpalatability by either producing ultrasonic noises which warn bats to avoid them,[fourteen] or by alert postures which expose brightly coloured trunk parts (encounter Unkenreflex), or exposing eyespots. Velvet ants (actually parasitic wasps) such as Dasymutilla occidentalis both take bright colours and produce aural noises when grabbed (via stridulation), which serve to reinforce the warning.[15] Amongst mammals, predators tin can exist dissuaded when a smaller brute is aggressive and able to defend itself, as for example in dearest badgers.[16]

Prevalence [edit]

In terrestrial ecosystems [edit]

Skunk, Mephitis mephitis, advertising its powerful defences, scent glands near the tail, by raising its tail and displaying its warning coloration

Aposematism is widespread in insects, but less so in vertebrates, being mostly confined to a smaller number of reptile, amphibian, and fish species, and some foul-smelling or aggressive mammals. Pitohuis, red and black birds whose toxic feathers and pare apparently comes from the poisonous beetles they ingest, could exist included.[17] It has been proposed that aposematism played a role in homo evolution, body odour carrying a warning to predators of big hominins able to defend themselves with weapons.[18]

Perhaps the most numerous aposematic vertebrates are the toxicant dart frogs (family: Dendrobatidae).[xix] These neotropical anuran amphibians exhibit a broad spectrum of coloration and toxicity.[20] Some species in this poison frog family (peculiarly Dendrobates, Epipedobates, and Phyllobates) are conspicuously coloured and sequester one of the most toxic alkaloids among all living species.[21] [22] Within the same family, there are also ambiguous frogs (such as Colostethus and Mannophryne) that lack these toxic alkaloids.[23] [24] Although these frogs brandish an all-encompassing array of coloration and toxicity, in that location is very niggling genetic departure between the species.[twenty] Evolution of their conspicuous coloration is correlated to traits such as chemical defense, dietary specialization, acoustic diversification, and increased body mass.[25] [22]

Some plants are thought to employ aposematism to warn herbivores of unpalatable chemicals or physical defences such as prickled leaves or thorns.[26] Many insects, such every bit cinnabar moth caterpillars, acquire toxic chemicals from their host plants.[27] Among mammals, skunks and zorillas annunciate their foul-smelling chemic defences with sharply contrasting black-and-white patterns on their fur, while the similarly-patterned badger and dearest badger advertise their sharp claws, powerful jaws, and ambitious natures.[28] Some brightly coloured birds such as passerines with contrasting patterns may also exist aposematic, at least in females; simply since male birds are frequently brightly coloured through sexual selection, and their coloration is not correlated with edibility, it is unclear whether aposematism is significant.[29]

The sound-producing rattle of rattlesnakes is an acoustic class of aposematism.[thirty] Sound production past the caterpillar of the Polyphemus moth, Antheraea polyphemus, may similarly be audio-visual aposematism, continued to and preceded by chemical defences.[31] Similar acoustic defences exist in a range of Bombycoidea caterpillars.[32]

In marine ecosystems [edit]

The existence of aposematism in marine ecosystems is controversial.[35] Many marine organisms, particularly those on coral reefs, are brightly coloured or patterned, including sponges, corals, molluscs and fish, with little or no connectedness to chemical or physical defenses. Caribbean reef sponges are brightly coloured, and many species are full of toxic chemicals, simply there is no statistical relationship between the two factors.[36]

Nudibranch molluscs are the most commonly cited examples of aposematism in marine ecosystems, simply the bear witness for this has been contested,[37] mostly considering (1) there are few examples of mimicry among species, (ii) many species are nocturnal or ambiguous, and (3) bright colours at the red cease of the colour spectrum are chop-chop adulterate as a office of water depth. For example, the Spanish Dancer nudibranch (genus Hexabranchus), among the largest of tropical marine slugs, potently chemically defended, and brilliantly reddish and white, is nocturnal and has no known mimics. Mimicry is to exist expected as Batesian mimics with weak defences can gain a measure of protection from their resemblance to aposematic species.[38] Other studies accept concluded that nudibranchs such every bit the slugs of the family Phyllidiidae from Indo-Pacific coral reefs are aposematically coloured.[39] Müllerian mimicry has been implicated in the coloration of some Mediterranean nudibranchs, all of which derive defensive chemicals from their sponge nutrition.[forty]

Iridescent blue rings on the mantles of the venomous octopus Hapalochlaena lunulata are considered by some to exist aposematic.

The crown-of-thorns starfish, like other starfish such as Metrodira subulata, has conspicuous coloration and conspicuous long, sharp spines, as well as cytolytic saponins, chemicals which could function as an constructive defence force; this evidence is argued to be sufficient for such species to be considered aposematic.[33] [34] Information technology has been proposed that aposematism and mimicry is less evident in marine invertebrates than terrestrial insects considering predation is a more than intense selective force for many insects, which disperse as adults rather than equally larvae and have much shorter generation times.[35] Further, there is show that fish predators such every bit blueheads may adapt to visual cues more rapidly than do birds, making aposematism less effective.[41]

Blueish-ringed octopuses are venomous. They spend much of their time hiding in crevices whilst displaying effective camouflage patterns with their dermal chromatophore cells. Yet, if they are provoked, they quickly modify colour, becoming bright yellow with each of the fifty-sixty rings flashing bright irised blue within a third of a 2d.[42] It is oft stated this is an aposematic warning display,[43] [44] [45] [46] but the hypothesis has rarely if ever been tested.[47]

Behaviour [edit]

The mechanism of defence relies on the memory of the would-be predator; a bird that has in one case experienced a foul-tasting grasshopper will effort to avert a repetition of the experience. As a consequence, aposematic species are often gregarious. Earlier the memory of a bad experience attenuates, the predator may accept the feel reinforced through repetition. Aposematic organisms often move in a languid fashion, as they take little demand for speed and agility. Instead, their morphology is oft tough and resistant to injury, thereby allowing them to escape once the predator is warned off. Aposematic species exercise not need to hide or stay still as cryptic organisms practice, so aposematic individuals benefit from more freedom in exposed areas and can spend more time foraging, allowing them to find more than and better quality nutrient.[48] They may also exist able to make use of conspicuous mating displays, including vocal signals, which may and so develop through sexual selection.[49] [22]

Origins of the theory [edit]

Gregarious nymphs of an aposematic milkweed bug, Lygaeus kalmii

Wallace, 1867 [edit]

In a letter to Alfred Russel Wallace dated 23 February 1867, Charles Darwin wrote, "On Mon evening I called on Bates & put a difficulty before him, which he could not answer, & every bit on some old similar occasion, his first suggestion was, 'you had ameliorate ask Wallace'. My difficulty is, why are caterpillars sometimes then beautifully & artistically coloured?"[50] Darwin was puzzled because his theory of sexual selection (where females cull their mates based on how attractive they are) could not apply to caterpillars since they are young and hence not sexually agile.

Wallace replied the next twenty-four hour period with the suggestion that since some caterpillars "...are protected by a disagreeable taste or scent, it would exist a positive advantage to them never to be mistaken for any of the palatable catterpillars [sic], considering a slight wound such as would exist caused past a peck of a bird'south bill nigh always I believe kills a growing catterpillar. Any gaudy & conspicuous colour therefore, that would plainly distinguish them from the brown & greenish eatable catterpillars, would enable birds to recognise them easily equally at a kind not fit for food, & thus they would escape seizure which is as bad as beingness eaten."[51]

Since Darwin was enthusiastic most the idea, Wallace asked the Entomological Society of London to exam the hypothesis.[52] In response, the entomologist John Jenner Weir conducted experiments with caterpillars and birds in his aviary, and in 1869 he provided the beginning experimental show for warning coloration in animals.[53] The evolution of aposematism surprised 19th-century naturalists because the probability of its institution in a population was presumed to exist low, since a conspicuous point suggested a higher take chances of predation.[54]

Poulton, 1890 [edit]

Wallace coined the term "warning colours" in an article nigh animal coloration in 1877.[5] In 1890 Edward Bagnall Poulton renamed the concept aposematism in his book The Colours of Animals.[iv] He described the derivation of the term every bit follows:

The second head (Sematic Colours) includes Alarm Colours and Recognition Markings: the quondam warn an enemy off, and are therefore chosen Aposematic [Greek, apo, from, and sema, sign][55]

Evolution [edit]

Aposematism is paradoxical in evolutionary terms, every bit it makes individuals conspicuous to predators, so they may be killed and the trait eliminated earlier predators larn to avoid information technology.[56] If alarm coloration puts the outset few individuals at such a strong disadvantage, information technology would never concluding in the species long enough to get beneficial.[57]

Supported explanations [edit]

There is evidence for explanations involving dietary conservatism, in which predators avoid new prey because information technology is an unknown quantity;[58] this is a long-lasting effect.[58] [59] [sixty] Dietary conservatism has been demonstrated experimentally in some species of birds and fish.[61] [58] [lx] [62]

Further, birds recall and avert objects that are both conspicuous and foul-tasting longer than objects that are equally foul-tasting only cryptically coloured.[63] This suggests that Wallace's original view, that alert coloration helped to teach predators to avoid prey thus coloured, was correct.[64] However, some birds (inexperienced starlings and domestic chicks) also innately avoid clearly coloured objects, as demonstrated using mealworms painted yellow and blackness to resemble wasps, with boring green controls. This implies that alert coloration works at least in part past stimulating the evolution of predators to encode the meaning of the alarm betoken, rather than past requiring each new generation to learn the signal'south meaning.[64] All of these results contradict the idea that novel, brightly coloured individuals would be more likely to be eaten or attacked by predators.[58] [65]

Alternative hypotheses [edit]

Other explanations are possible. Predators might innately fear unfamiliar forms (neophobia)[66] long plenty for them to become established, simply this is likely to be only temporary.[57] [66] [67]

Alternatively, casualty animals might be sufficiently gregarious to form clusters tight enough to enhance the warning betoken. If the species was already unpalatable, predators might learn to avoid the cluster, protecting gregarious individuals with the new aposematic trait.[68] [69] Gregariousness would assist predators to learn to avoid unpalatable, gregarious prey.[70] Aposematism could besides be favoured in dense populations even if these are not gregarious.[58] [66]

Another possibility is that a gene for aposematism might be recessive and located on the X chromosome.[71] If and so, predators would larn to associate the colour with unpalatability from males with the trait, while heterozygous females acquit the trait until it becomes mutual and predators empathize the bespeak.[71] Well-fed predators might too ignore aposematic morphs, preferring other prey species.[57] [72]

A farther explanation is that females might adopt brighter males, so sexual pick could outcome in aposematic males having higher reproductive success than not-aposematic males if they can survive long enough to mate. Sexual selection is strong enough to allow seemingly maladaptive traits to persist despite other factors working against the trait.[xix]

Once aposematic individuals reach a sure threshold population, for whatever reason, the predator learning process would be spread out over a larger number of individuals and therefore is less likely to wipe out the trait for warning coloration completely.[73] If the population of aposematic individuals all originated from the same few individuals, the predator learning process would effect in a stronger alarm signal for surviving kin, resulting in college inclusive fitness for the dead or injured individuals through kin selection.[74]

A theory for the evolution of aposematism posits that it arises by reciprocal selection betwixt predators and prey, where distinctive features in prey, which could be visual or chemic, are selected past not-discriminating predators, and where, concurrently, avoidance of distinctive casualty is selected by predators. Concurrent reciprocal selection (CRS) may entail learning past predators or it may give ascent to unlearned avoidances by them. Aposematism arising by CRS operates without special conditions of the gregariousness or the relatedness of prey, and information technology is non contingent upon predator sampling of prey to learn that aposematic cues are associated with unpalatability or other unprofitable features.[75]

Mimicry [edit]

Aposematism is a sufficiently successful strategy to take had significant furnishings on the evolution of both aposematic and non-aposematic species.

Non-aposematic species have often evolved to mimic the conspicuous markings of their aposematic counterparts. For example, the hornet moth is a deceptive mimic of the yellowjacket wasp; it resembles the wasp, merely has no sting. A predator which avoids the wasp will to some degree also avoid the moth. This is known equally Batesian mimicry, later on Henry Walter Bates, a British naturalist who studied Amazonian collywobbles in the 2d half of the 19th century.[76] Batesian mimicry is frequency dependent: it is nearly effective when the ratio of mimic to model is depression; otherwise, predators will run into the mimic too often.[77] [78]

A second course of mimicry occurs when two aposematic organisms share the same anti-predator adaptation and non-deceptively mimic each other, to the benefit of both species, since fewer individuals of either species need to be attacked for predators to acquire to avoid both of them. This form of mimicry is known equally Müllerian mimicry, after Fritz Müller, a German naturalist who studied the phenomenon in the Amazon in the tardily 19th century.[79] [eighty] Many species of bee and wasp that occur together are Müllerian mimics; their similar coloration teaches predators that a striped pattern is associated with being stung. Therefore, a predator which has had a negative experience with any such species will likely avoid any that resemble it in the future. Müllerian mimicry is found in vertebrates such as the mimic poison frog (Ranitomeya imitator) which has several morphs throughout its natural geographical range, each of which looks very similar to a dissimilar species of poisonous substance frog which lives in that area.[81]

  • A model (to be mimicked), the venomous and genuinely aposematic coral serpent

Run across also [edit]

  • Handicap principle

References [edit]

  1. ^ Santos, J. C.; Coloma, Luis A.; Cannatella, D. C. (2003). "Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (22): 12792–12797. doi:10.1073/pnas.2133521100. PMC240697. PMID 14555763.
  2. ^ Eisner, T.; Grant, R. P. (1981). "Toxicity, Smell Disfavor, and 'Olfactory Aposematism'". Scientific discipline. 213 (4506): 476. doi:10.1126/science.7244647. PMID 7244647.
  3. ^ a b Poulton 1890, pp. Foldout "The Colours of Animals Classified According to Their Uses", after folio 339.
  4. ^ a b c Marek, Paul. "Aposematism". Apheloria. Archived from the original on viii July 2017. Retrieved Nov 24, 2012.
  5. ^ a b Wallace, Alfred Russel (1877). "The Colours of Animals and Plants. I.—The Colours of Animals". Macmillan'due south Magazine. 36 (215): 384–408.
  6. ^ Ruxton, Sherratt & Speed 2004, pp. 82–103.
  7. ^ a b Maan, K. E.; Cummings, M. East. (2012). "Poison frog colors are honest signals of toxicity, specially for bird predators". American Naturalist. 179 (1): E1–E14. doi:x.1086/663197. hdl:2152/31175. JSTOR 663197. PMID 22173468. S2CID 1963316.
  8. ^ Blount, Jonathan D.; Speed, Michael P.; Ruxton, Graeme D.; et al. (2009). "Warning displays may function as honest signals of toxicity". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 276 (1658): 871–877. doi:x.1098/rspb.2008.1407. PMC2664363. PMID 19019790.
  9. ^ Sendova-Franks, Ana; Scott, Michelle Pellissier (2015). "Featured Articles in This Month'due south Beast Behaviour". Animal Behaviour. 100: iii–5. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.013. S2CID 53202282.
  10. ^ a b Stevens, One thousand.; Ruxton, G. D. (2012). "Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature". Proceedings of the Regal Gild B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1728): 417–426. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1932. PMC3234570. PMID 22113031.
  11. ^ Tullberg, B. S., Merilaita South., & Wiklund, C. (2005). "Aposematism and Crypsis Combined as a Result of Distance Dependence: Functional Versatility of the Colour Blueprint in the Swallowtail Butterfly Larva". Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 272 (1570): 1315–1321. doi:x.1098/rspb.2005.3079. PMC1560331. PMID 16006332. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  12. ^ Wang, I. J.; Shaffer, H. B. (2008). "Rapid color development in an aposematic species: A phylogenetic analysis of colour variation in the strikingly polymorphic strawberry poisonous substance-dart frog". Evolution. 62 (11): 2742–2759. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00507.x. PMID 18764916.
  13. ^ MacAuslane, Heather J. (2008). "Aposematism". In Capinera (ed.). Encyclopedia Entomologica. Vol. 4. pp. 239–242.
  14. ^ a b Hristov, N. I.; Conner, W. East. (2005). "Audio strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat–tiger moth arms race". Naturwissenschaften. 92 (4): 164–169. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0611-seven. PMID 15772807. S2CID 18306198.
  15. ^ Schmidt, J. O.; Blum, M. S. (1977). "Adaptations and Responses of Dasymutilla occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) to Predators". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 21 (two): 99–111. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1977.tb02663.x. S2CID 83847876.
  16. ^ "Black, White and Stinky: Explaining Coloration in Skunks and Other Boldly Colored Animals". University of Massachusetts Amherst. 27 May 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2016.
  17. ^ Dumbacher, J. P.; Beehler, B. One thousand.; Spande, T. F.; et al. (1992). "Homobatrachotoxin in the genus Pitohui: chemical defense force in birds?". Science. 258 (5083): 799–801. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.1439786. PMID 1439786.
  18. ^ Weldon, Paul J. (xviii Baronial 2018). "Are we chemically aposematic? Revisiting L. South. B. Leakey'south hypothesis on man body odour". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 125 (2): 221–228. doi:ten.1093/biolinnean/bly109.
  19. ^ a b Maan, Grand. E.; Cummings, M. Due east. (2009). "Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (45): 19072–19077. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903327106. PMC2776464. PMID 19858491.
  20. ^ a b Summers, Kyle; Clough, Mark E. (2001-05-22). "The development of coloration and toxicity in the poisonous substance frog family (Dendrobatidae)". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (11): 6227–6232. doi:x.1073/pnas.101134898. PMC33450. PMID 11353830.
  21. ^ Santos, Juan C.; Tarvin, Rebecca D.; O'Connell, Lauren A. (2016). Schulte, Bruce A.; Goodwin, Thomas East.; Ferkin, Michael H. (eds.). "A Review of Chemical Defense in Poison Frogs (Dendrobatidae): Ecology, Pharmacokinetics, and Autoresistance". Chemic Signals in Vertebrates. Springer International Publishing. 13: 305–337. doi:10.1007/978-three-319-22026-0_21. ISBN9783319220260. S2CID 85845409.
  22. ^ a b c Santos, Juan C.; Baquero, Margarita; Barrio-Amorós, César; et al. (2014-12-07). "Aposematism increases acoustic diversification and speciation in poison frogs". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1796): 20141761. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1761. PMC4213648. PMID 25320164.
  23. ^ Guillory, Wilson X.; Muell, Morgan R.; Summers, Kyle; et al. (August 2019). "Phylogenomic Reconstruction of the Neotropical Poison Frogs (Dendrobatidae) and Their Conservation". Multifariousness. eleven (eight): 126. doi:10.3390/d11080126.
  24. ^ "Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs (PDF Download Available)". ResearchGate . Retrieved 2017-11-xi .
  25. ^ Santos, Juan C.; Cannatella, David C. (2011-04-12). "Phenotypic integration emerges from aposematism and scale in poison frogs". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (15): 6175–6180. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010952108. PMC3076872. PMID 21444790.
  26. ^ Rubino, Darrin Fifty.; McCarthy, Brian C. "Presence of Aposematic (Alert) Coloration in Vascular Plants of Southeastern Ohio" Journal of the Torrey Botanical Gild, Vol. 131, No. 3 (Jul-Sep 2004), pp. 252-256. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4126955
  27. ^ Edmunds 1974, pp. 199–201.
  28. ^ Caro, Tim (2009). "Contrasting coloration in terrestrial mammals". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 364 (1516): 537–548. doi:ten.1098/rstb.2008.0221. PMC2674080. PMID 18990666.
  29. ^ Götmark, Frank (1994). "Are Vivid Birds Distasteful? A Re-Analysis of H. B. Cott's Information on the Edibility of Birds". Journal of Avian Biological science. 25 (3): 184–197. doi:10.2307/3677074. JSTOR 3677074.
  30. ^ Meik, Jesse 1000.; Pires-daSilva, André (ten February 2009). "Evolutionary morphology of the rattlesnake style". BMC Evolutionary Biology. ix (1): 35. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-35. PMC2645363. PMID 19208237.
  31. ^ Brown, Sarah Yard.; Boettner, George H.; Yack, Jayne E. (xv March 2007). "Clicking caterpillars: acoustic aposematism in Antheraea polyphemus and other Bombycoidea". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 210 (vi): 993–1005. doi:ten.1242/jeb.001990.
  32. ^ Bura, Veronica L.; Kawahara, Akito Y.; Yack, Jayne E. (xi August 2016). "A Comparative Analysis of Sonic Defences in Bombycoidea Caterpillars". Scientific Reports. six (1): 31469. doi:x.1038/srep31469. PMC4980592.
  33. ^ a b Shedd, John G. (2006). "Crown of Thorns Sea Star". Shedd Aquarium. Archived from the original on 22 Feb 2014. Retrieved 21 June 2015.
  34. ^ a b Inbar, Moshe; Lev-Yadun, Simcha (2005). "Conspicuous and aposematic spines in the fauna kingdom" (PDF). Naturwissenschaften. 92 (4): 170–172. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0608-two. PMID 15761732. S2CID 8525349. defensive creature spines are oft conspicuous (shape and color) and should be considered aposematic... Classic examples are the starfishes Acanthaster planci and Metrodira subulata, which take red spines...
  35. ^ a b Pawlik, J. R. (2012). Fattorusso, Due east.; et al. (eds.). Antipredatory defensive roles of natural products from marine invertebrates. Handbook of Marine Natural Products. Springer. pp. 677–710.
  36. ^ Pawlik, J. R.; et al. (1995). "Defenses of Caribbean sponges against predatory reef fish: I. Chemical deterrenc". Marine Ecology Progress Serial. 127: 183–194. doi:10.3354/meps127183.
  37. ^ Edmunds, Malcolm (1991). "Does warning coloration occur in nudibranchs?". Malacologia. 32: 241–255.
  38. ^ Pawlik, J. R.; et al. (1988). "Defensive chemicals of the Spanish Dancer nudibranch, Hexabranchus sanguineus, and its egg ribbons: Macrolides derived from a sponge diet". Journal of Experimental Marine Biological science and Ecology. 119 (ii): 99–109. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(88)90225-0.
  39. ^ Ritson-Williams, R.; Paul, V. J. (2007). "Marine benthic invertebrates use multimodal cues for defense against reef fish". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 340: 29–39. doi:ten.3354/meps340029.
  40. ^ Haber, M.; et al. (2010). "Coloration and defence in the nudibranch gastropod Hypselodoris fontandraui". Biological Bulletin. 218 (2): 181–188. doi:10.1086/BBLv218n2p181. PMID 20413794. S2CID 10948319.
  41. ^ Miller, A. Thou.; Pawlik, J. R. (2013). "Do coral reef fish acquire to avert unpalatable prey using visual cues?". Beast Behaviour. 85 (2): 339–347. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.11.002. S2CID 43941481.
  42. ^ Mäthger, L. 1000. (2012). Bell, G. R., Kuzirian, A. M., Allen, J. J. and Hanlon, R. T. "How does the bluish-ringed octopus (Hapalochlaena lunulata) flash its blue rings?". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 215 (21): 3752–3757. doi:10.1242/jeb.076869. PMID 23053367.
  43. ^ Williams, B. Fifty. (2011). Lovenburg, 5., Huffard, C. L. and Caldwell, R. Fifty. "Chemical defense in pelagic octopus paralarvae: Tetrodotoxin solitary does not protect individual paralarvae of the greater blue-ringed octopus (Hapalochlaena lunulata) from common reef predators". Chemoecology. 21 (three): 131–141. doi:10.1007/s00049-011-0075-5. S2CID 9953958.
  44. ^ Huffard, C. L., Saarman, N., Hamilton, H. and Simison, Due west. B. (2010). "The evolution of conspicuous facultative mimicry in octopuses: an instance of secondary accommodation?". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 101 (ane): 68–77. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01484.x. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  45. ^ Lambert, Due west. A. (2011). A Review of Blue-ringed Octopus Conservation (Masters thesis). Prescott Higher.
  46. ^ Hanlon, R. T.; Messenger, J. B. (1998). Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
  47. ^ Umbers, G. D. (2013). "On the perception, production and function of bluish coloration in animals". Journal of Zoology. 289 (four): 229–242. doi:10.1111/jzo.12001.
  48. ^ Speed, M. P.; Brockhurst, M. A.; Ruxton, Yard. D. (2010). "The dual benefits of aposematism: predator avoidance and enhanced resources drove". Evolution. 64 (6): 1622–1633. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00931.x. PMID 20050915. S2CID 21509940.
  49. ^ Rudh, A.; Rogell, B.; Håstad, O.; et al. (2011). "Rapid population divergence linked with co-variation between coloration and sexual display in strawberry poisonous substance frogs". Evolution. 65 (5): 1271–1282. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01210.ten. PMID 21166789. S2CID 10785432.
  50. ^ Darwin, Charles. "Alphabetic character from Charles Robert Darwin to Alfred Russel Wallace dated 23 Feb [1867]".
  51. ^ Wallace, Alfred Russel. "Letter from Alfred Russel Wallace to Charles Robert Darwin dated 24 Feb [1867]".
  52. ^ Anon (1867). "Word [Wallace's explanation of brilliant colors in caterpillar larvae, and others' comments thereon, presented at the ESL meeting of 4 March 1867]". Journal of Proceedings of the Entomological Social club of London: 80–lxxxi.
  53. ^ Slotten, Ross (2004). The Heretic in Darwin's Courtroom:The Life of Alfred Russel Wallace. New York: Columbia Academy Printing. pp. 253–524. ISBN978-0-231-13010-3.
  54. ^ Higashi, Masahiko; Yachi, Shigeo (August 1998). "The evolution of alert signals". Nature. 394 (6696): 882–884. doi:10.1038/29751. S2CID 204999972.
  55. ^ Poulton 1890, pp. 337–338.
  56. ^ Briolat, Emmanuelle S.; Burdfield-Steel, Emily R.; Paul, Sarah C.; et al. (2019). "Diversity in warning coloration: selective paradox or the norm?". Biological Reviews. 94 (two): 388–414. doi:10.1111/brv.12460. PMC6446817. PMID 30152037.
  57. ^ a b c Mappes, Johanna; Marples, Nicola; Endler, John A. (2005). "The complex business of survival by aposematism". Trends in Environmental and Evolution. 20 (11): 598–603. doi:x.1016/j.tree.2005.07.011. PMID 16701442.
  58. ^ a b c d due east Thomas, R. J.; Marples, N. M.; Cuthill, Innes C.; et al. (2003). "Dietary conservatism may facilitate the initial evolution of aposematism". Oikos. 101 (3): 548–566. doi:x.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12061.x.
  59. ^ Marples, Nicola G.; Kelly, David J.; Thomas, Robert J. (2005). "Perspective: The evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical". Evolution. 59 (5): 933–940. doi:x.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01032.x. PMID 16136793.
  60. ^ a b Lindstrom, Leena; Altalo, Rauno V.; Lyytinen, Anne; et al. (2001). "Predator feel on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey". Proceedings of the Royal Social club. 268 (1465): 357–361. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1377. PMC1088614. PMID 11270431.
  61. ^ Richards, Eastward. Loys; Thomas, Robert J.; Marples, Nicola Thousand.; et al. (2011). "The expression of dietary conservatism in solitary and shoaling three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus". Behavioral Ecology. 22 (iv): 738–744. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr047.
  62. ^ Richards, E. Loys; Alexander, Lucille Grand.; Snellgrove, Donna; et al. (February 2014). "Variation in the expression of dietary conservatism within and between fish species". Animal Behaviour. 88: 49–56. doi:ten.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.009. S2CID 53174146.
  63. ^ Siddall, Emma C.; Marples, Nicola M. (2008-01-22). "Better to be bimodal: the interaction of color and olfactory property on learning and memory". Behavioral Ecology. 19 (2): 425–432. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm155.
  64. ^ a b Roper, Tim J. (nine July 1987). "All things vivid and poisonous". New Scientist. Reed Business Data. pp. 50–52.
  65. ^ Marples, Nicola K.; Kelly, David J.; Thomas, Robert J. (May 2005). "Perspective: The Evolution of Warning Coloration is Not Paradoxical". Development. 59 (5): 933–940. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01032.x. PMID 16136793.
  66. ^ a b c Speed, Michael P. (2001). "Can receiver psychology explain the development of aposematism?". Animate being Behaviour. 61 (1): 205–216. doi:x.1006/anbe.2000.1558. PMID 11170710. S2CID 13434024.
  67. ^ Exernova, Alice; Stys, Pavel; Fucikova, Eva; et al. (2007). "Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate?". Behavioral Ecology. 18 (1): 148–156. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl061.
  68. ^ Gamberale, Gabriella; Tullberg, Birgitta Southward. (1998). "Aposematism and gregariousness: the combined effect of group size and coloration on signal repellence". Proceedings of the Imperial Society B: Biological Sciences. 265 (1399): 889–894. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0374. PMC1689056.
  69. ^ Mappes, Johanna; Alatalo, Rauno V. (1996). "Effects of novelty and gregariousness in survival of aposematic prey". Behavioral Ecology. 8 (2): 174–177. doi:x.1093/beheco/eight.2.174.
  70. ^ Ruxton, Graeme D.; Sherratt, Thomas N. (2006). "Aggregation, defence force, and warning signals: the evolutionary relationship". Proceedings of the Regal Lodge. 273 (1600): 2417–2424. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3570. PMC1634906. PMID 16959629.
  71. ^ a b Brodie, Edmund D. 3; Agrawal, Anell F. (2001). "Maternal furnishings and the evolution of aposematic signals". Proceedings of the National University of Sciences. 98 (fourteen): 7884–7887. doi:10.1073/pnas.141075998. PMC35437. PMID 11416165.
  72. ^ Merilaita, Sami; Kaitala, Veijo (2002). "Community structure and the evolution of aposematic coloration". Environmental Messages. v (4): 495–501. doi:ten.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00362.x. S2CID 7188102.
  73. ^ Lee, T. J.; Marples, N. Grand.; Speed, M. P. (2010). "Can dietary conservatism explain the chief evolution of aposematism?". Animal Behaviour. 79: 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.004. S2CID 54273453.
  74. ^ Servedio, K. R. (2000). "The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration". Evolution. 54 (3): 751–763. doi:ten.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00077.x. PMID 10937250.
  75. ^ Weldon, P.J. (December 2013). "Chemic aposematism". Chemoecology. 23 (4): 201–202. doi:10.1007/s00049-013-0140-iii. S2CID 27025142.
  76. ^ Bates, Henry Walter (1861). "Contributions to an insect animate being of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae". Transactions of the Linnean Gild. 23 (3): 495–566. doi:ten.1111/j.1096-3642.1860.tb00146.ten. ; Reprint: Bates, Henry Walter (1981). "Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae)". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. sixteen (1): 41–54. doi:ten.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb01842.10.
  77. ^ Harper, G. R.; Pfennig, D. W (22 August 2007). "Mimicry on the border: why do mimics vary in resemblance to their model in different parts of their geographical range?". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1621): 1955–1961. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0558. PMC2275182. PMID 17567563.
  78. ^ Edmunds 1974, p. 112.
  79. ^ Müller, Fritz (1878). "Ueber die Vortheile der Mimicry bei Schmetterlingen" [On the advantages of mimicry in butterflies]. Zoologischer Anzeiger (in High german). 1: 54–55.
  80. ^ Müller, Fritz (1879). Translated past R. Meldola. "Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable example of mimicry in butterflies". Proclamations of the Entomological Social club of London. 1879: twenty–29.
  81. ^ Twomey, Evan; Chocolate-brown, Jason (1986). "Ranitomeya imitator". Dendrobates.org . Retrieved 11 May 2015.

Sources [edit]

  • Edmunds, Malcolm (1974). Defence in Animals . Longman. ISBN978-0-582-44132-iii.
  • Poulton, Edward Bagnall (1890). The Colours of Animals, their pregnant and use, especially considered in the instance of insects. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trübner.
  • Ruxton, Graeme D.; Sherratt, T. N.; Speed, M. P. (2004). Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN978-0-19-852859-three.

External links [edit]

  • Media related to Alert coloration at Wikimedia Commons

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism

Posted by: sanchezhoullatc.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Term Describes The Behavior Of An Animal Which Warned Others That A Predator Is Approaching?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel